Please, join me and thousands of other likeminded believers in coming before God and interceding on behalf of Nigeria.

Prayer focus:Ephesians 6:13-14; 2 Chr.7:14

Our nation is in a vulnerable position both from a national security standpoint, from economic standpoint and from a spiritual standpoint. With wars continuing to rage across the globe, political leaders missing in action, and unprecedented failure, and policy summersault of the government and political ground standing, instability, corruption, terrorism, kidnapping etc, followers of Christ need to be a source of stabilizing hope during this time of chaos.

We are living in very unsettled and turbulent times, but we take comfort in the fact that no matter who holds the reins of power that God remains on the throne. While some might be taken in by the calls for protests and expressions of grievances of various ethnic nationalities and groups, we as the church remain true to the core values we find in scripture, and we will not compromise biblical truth.
Scriptures tells us that if the people of God pray and seek His face, that He will heal our land(2 Chr. 7:14). Therefore, I, the undersigned, commit to praying for the security and stability of my country Nigeria, that our nation would return to God, and place its trust in Him. I, as a member of the church and the body of Christ, commit to being a shining light rooted in the word of God, and I am praying for other believers to remain focused on the Lord, and not be tossed about by the waves of political uncertainty as others are.
I pray that the Lord would use these unstable times to turn people to Him and redeem Nigeria as a nation under God indeed and in truth.

The God of the Bible is a sovereign and all-knowing God who sees the hearts and actions of individuals and nations. While the Bible does not specifically mention Nigeria, it provides principles and wisdom that can be applied to understand the problems facing the nation. Here are some possible problems of Nigeria according to the God of the Bible:

1. *Idolatry and sin* (1 Corinthians 10:14, John 8:24): Nigeria's reliance on false gods, ancestral worship, and sinful practices grieve God's heart.

2. *Injustice and corruption* (Isaiah 1:17, Micah 6:8): God hates injustice, bribery, and corruption, which are prevalent in Nigeria.

3. *Disunity and strife* (1 Corinthians 3:3-4, Matthew 25:31-46): Nigeria's ethnic and religious conflicts, as well as political divisions, displease God.

4. *Lack of righteousness and morality* (Proverbs 14:34, Psalm 119:136): The decay of moral values and righteousness in Nigerian society concerns God.

5. *Neglect of the poor and vulnerable* (Proverbs 14:31, Isaiah 58:6-7): God is displeased with Nigeria's neglect of the poor, widows, and orphans.

6. *Leadership failures* (Proverbs 28:2-3, Isaiah 1:10-17): Corrupt and ineffective leadership in Nigeria grieves God's heart.

7. *Rejection of God's wisdom* (Proverbs 1:24-33, Hosea 4:6): Nigeria's refusal to seek and apply God's wisdom in its affairs displeases Him.

8. *Bloodshed and violence* (Genesis 4:10-11, Ezekiel 22:2-4): The bloodshed, terrorism, and violence in Nigeria cry out to God for justice.

9. *Materialism and greed* (1 Timothy 6:10, Luke 12:15): Nigeria's obsession with wealth and materialism, rather than God, is a problem.

10. *Spiritual blindness* (2 Corinthians 4:4, Matthew 6:23): The spiritual blindness and ignorance of God's truth in Nigeria sadden God's heart.

Please note that these problems are not unique to Nigeria, and God's desire is for Nigeria and all nations to repent and turn to Him (Isaiah 45:22, Acts 17:30).

Here are some biblical principles of civil government and their application to the Nigerian case:

1. *Submission to authority* (Romans 13:1-7): Christians are called to submit to governing authorities, including those in Nigeria.

2. *Rendering unto Caesar* (Matthew 22:15-22): Paying taxes and respecting the state's authority are essential.

3. *Promoting justice and righteousness* (Micah 6:8): Nigerian Christians should advocate for justice, equality, and righteousness in governance.

4. *Loving neighbors* (Mark 12:30-31): Christians should prioritize the well-being of fellow Nigerians, regardless of tribe or religion.

5. *Seeking wisdom and discernment* (James 1:5-8): Christians should pray for wisdom and discernment in governance and decision-making.

6. *Addressing corruption* (Exodus 23:8): Nigerian Christians should speak out against corruption and promote transparency and accountability.

7. *Promoting peace and unity* (Psalm 133:1-3): Christians should work towards national unity and peaceful coexistence.

8. *Respecting the rule of law* (1 Peter 2:13-17): Christians should respect and obey the laws of the land, even when challenging unjust systems.

9. *Advocating for the vulnerable* (Proverbs 31:8-9): Nigerian Christians should speak out for the rights of the marginalized and oppressed.

10. *Praying for leaders* (1 Timothy 2:1-4): Christians should pray for Nigerian leaders, seeking God's guidance and wisdom for them.

By reflecting on these biblical principles, Nigerian Christians can engage with their civil government in a way that honors God and promotes the well-being of their nation.

In Nigeria, Casuistry can use authoritative means to develop political party bylaws by:

1. Referencing the Constitution of Nigeria and the Electoral Act
2. Consulting legal frameworks such as the Political Party Registration Act and the Nigerian Political Party Policy
3. Citing the party's constitution, manifesto, and historical documents
4. Invoking expert opinion from Nigerian legal and political experts
5. Analyzing similar political parties' bylaws in Nigeria and Africa
6. Seeking input from stakeholders, including party members, leaders, and civil society organizations
7. Evaluating ethical implications in light of Nigerian cultural and religious values
8. Considering precedent from Nigerian political parties and international organizations
9. Using logical reasoning and argumentation to develop clear and consistent bylaws
10. Documenting the process and reasoning behind the bylaw development

Additionally, Casuistry can:

1. Consult with traditional leaders and cultural experts to ensure bylaws respect Nigerian customs and traditions
2. Engage with religious leaders to ensure bylaws align with religious teachings and values
3. Reference international best practices and guidelines from organizations like the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance
4. Use Nigerian case law and judicial decisions to inform bylaw development
5. Collaborate with other political parties and stakeholders to ensure bylaws promote national unity and democratic governance.

By incorporating these authoritative means, Casuistry can help Nigerian political parties develop comprehensive and effective bylaws that reflect the country's unique cultural, religious, and political context.

Casuistry can use authoritative means to develop political party bylaws by:

1. Referencing constitutional documents: Casuists can analyze the party's constitution, charter, or founding documents to identify core values and principles that should guide bylaw development.

2. Consulting legal frameworks: Casuists can examine relevant laws and regulations that govern political parties and their operations, ensuring bylaws comply with legal requirements.

3. Citing party history and tradition: Casuists can draw on the party's past practices, customs, and decisions to inform bylaw development and maintain continuity.

4. Invoking expert opinion: Casuists can consult with experts in relevant fields (e.g., law, ethics, governance) to ensure bylaws reflect best practices and authoritative guidance.

5. Conducting thorough analysis: Casuists can meticulously analyze various scenarios, cases, and hypotheticals to develop bylaws that address potential issues and conflicts.

6. Seeking input from stakeholders: Casuists can engage with party members, leaders, and other stakeholders to ensure bylaws reflect the party's values, needs, and concerns.

7. Evaluating ethical implications: Casuists can assess the ethical implications of different bylaw provisions, ensuring they align with the party's moral principles and values.

8. Considering precedent: Casuists can examine how similar political parties or organizations have addressed similar issues in their bylaws.

9. Using logical reasoning: Casuists can apply logical reasoning and argumentation to develop clear, consistent, and coherent bylaws.

10. Documenting the process: Casuists can maintain a record of the bylaw development process, including the reasoning, analysis, and authorities relied upon.

By employing these authoritative means, casuistry can help political parties develop comprehensive, ethical, and effective bylaws that reflect their values and principles.

Here are a few examples of political parties that have used casuistry to develop a taxonomy for their bylaws or policy platforms:

1. *Democratic Party (USA)*: The Democratic Party's platform is organized into various categories (e.g., economy, education, healthcare) and subcategories (e.g., affordable college, student debt relief). This taxonomy helps to structure their policy positions and provide a clear framework for decision-making.

2. *Conservative Party (UK)*: The Conservative Party's manifesto is organized into sections (e.g., economy, society, environment) and subsections (e.g., tax reform, education reform). This taxonomy reflects their values and priorities, guiding their policy development.

3. *Green Party (Germany)*: Die Grünen (The Greens) have developed a comprehensive policy platform organized into thematic areas (e.g., climate, energy, transportation). Their taxonomy reflects their emphasis on environmental protection and social justice.

4. *Liberal Party of Canada*: The Liberal Party's policy platform is structured around key themes (e.g., economy, diversity, climate change) and subthemes (e.g., innovation, reconciliation). This taxonomy informs their legislative priorities and decision-making.

5. *African National Congress (ANC) (South Africa)*: The ANC's constitution and policy documents are organized into sections (e.g., social transformation, economic development) and subsections (e.g., education, healthcare). Their taxonomy reflects their commitment to social justice and equality.

Please note that these examples are not explicit instances of casuistry, but rather illustrations of how political parties have developed taxonomies to organize their policy platforms and bylaws. Casuistry can be an implicit or explicit part of this process, helping parties to analyze cases, identify patterns, and develop nuanced policies.

Casuistry can be used to arrange and sort cases to create a taxonomy for a political party by:

1. Identifying key issues and themes: Casuists can analyze various cases and identify common themes and issues that are relevant to the political party's platform.

2. Categorizing cases: Casuists can group similar cases together based on their characteristics, such as economic, social, or environmental issues.

3. Developing subcategories: Casuists can create subcategories within each main category to further refine and specify the types of cases.

4. Analyzing relationships between cases: Casuists can examine how different cases relate to each other and identify patterns, contradictions, and areas of tension.

5. Evaluating ethical implications: Casuists can assess the ethical implications of each case and category, considering the political party's values and principles.

6. Creating a hierarchical structure: Casuists can organize the categories and subcategories into a hierarchical structure, creating a taxonomy that is easy to navigate.

7. Refining and updating: Casuists can continually refine and update the taxonomy as new cases emerge and circumstances change.

The resulting taxonomy can serve as a valuable resource for the political party, providing:

1. A clear and organized framework for understanding complex issues
2. A basis for developing nuanced and informed policies
3. A tool for communicating effectively with constituents and stakeholders
4. A means of identifying areas of consensus and disagreement within the party
5. A foundation for building a coherent and principled political platform

By using casuistry to develop a taxonomy, a political party can create a robust and ethical framework for addressing the complex issues that arise in politics.

Casuistry is a method of reasoning and problem-solving that involves analyzing specific cases and circumstances to develop moral and ethical guidelines. In the context of developing political manifestos, casuistry can be a useful approach to:

1. Identify key issues and concerns
2. Analyze complex situations and their ethical implications
3. Develop nuanced and context-specific policy solutions
4. Consider multiple perspectives and stakeholders
5. Evaluate the potential consequences of different courses of action

By using casuistry as a basis for developing political manifestos, political parties or candidates can:

1. Create more informed and thoughtful policies
2. Address the specific needs and concerns of different constituencies
3. Develop a more nuanced and pragmatic approach to governance
4. Demonstrate a commitment to ethical and moral reasoning
5. Enhance their credibility and trustworthiness with voters

Some potential applications of casuistry in developing political manifestos include:

1. Case studies of specific social or economic issues
2. Analysis of historical precedents and their relevance to current policy debates
3. Examination of different cultural or religious perspectives on key issues
4. Evaluation of the ethical implications of different policy options
5. Development of scenario-based planning and contingency strategies

By incorporating casuistry into the manifesto development process, political parties or candidates can create more robust, informed, and ethical policies that better serve the needs of their constituents.

Political capital refers to the accumulation of goodwill, trust, and influence that a political leader or organization possesses, which can be used to achieve their goals, pass legislation, or implement policies. It's a metaphorical "currency" that can be earned, spent, and invested to advance their agenda.

Political capital can be built through:

1. Popularity and public approval
2. Successful policy initiatives
3. Strong leadership and decision-making
4. Building coalitions and alliances
5. Effective communication and messaging
6. Crisis management and response
7. Delivering on campaign promises
8. Demonstrating empathy and understanding

Political capital can be spent by:

1. Advocating for controversial policies
2. Making tough decisions
3. Taking risks and facing challenges
4. Confronting opposition and criticism
5. Implementing unpopular but necessary reforms
6. Supporting other politicians or causes
7. Addressing national or international crises

When political capital is high, leaders can:

1. Pass significant legislation
2. Build broad coalitions
3. Influence public opinion
4. Overcome opposition
5. Achieve their policy objectives

Conversely, when political capital is low, leaders may struggle to:

1. Advance their agenda
2. Build support
3. Overcome obstacles
4. Maintain public trust

Political capital is a vital asset for effective governance, but it can be fragile and fleeting, requiring careful management and replenishment.

Political correctness (PC) refers to language, policies, and behaviors that avoid offending or marginalizing certain groups, particularly those related to:

1. Race
2. Gender
3. Sexual orientation
4. Religion
5. Disability
6. Socioeconomic status

PC aims to promote inclusivity, respect, and equality by:

1. Avoiding stereotypes and biases
2. Using neutral or inclusive language
3. Recognizing and addressing systemic inequalities
4. Creating a safe and welcoming environment

However, some critics argue that PC can:

1. Limit free speech
2. Create a culture of censorship
3. Foster a sense of entitlement
4. Ignore or downplay legitimate concerns

The concept of PC is complex and contentious, with varying interpretations and implications. While intended to promote social justice and equality, its implementation can be nuanced and context-dependent.